Matter of Turner v Fischer

Annotate this Case
Matter of Matter of Turner v Fischer 2012 NY Slip Op 03654 Decided on May 8, 2012 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on May 8, 2012
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, A.P.J.
L. PRISCILLA HALL
PLUMMER E. LOTT
SANDRA L. SGROI, JJ.
2010-08088
(Index No. 2002/10)

[*1]In the Matter of Cedric Turner, petitioner,

v

Brian Fischer, etc., respondent.




Cedric Turner, Malone, N.Y., appellant pro se.
Eric T. Schneiderman, New York, N.Y. (Michael S. Belohlavek
and Ann P. Zybert of counsel), for
respondent.


DECISION & JUDGMENT

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of Norman R. Bezio, Director of Special Housing/Inmate Disciplinary Program, on behalf of Brian Fischer, as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Correctional Services, dated January 15, 2010, which affirmed a determination of a hearing officer dated November 12, 2009, made after a Tier III disciplinary hearing, finding that the petitioner violated prison rule 113.10 (7 NYCRR 270.2[b][14][i]) by possessing contraband classified as a weapon, and imposing a penalty.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs or disbursements, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits.

The possibility that "the weapon [in question] could have been placed in the [petitioner's cell] door track by another inmate" (Matter of Jimenez v Fischer, 87 AD3d 771, 771) did not negate the existence of substantial evidence to support the determination that the petitioner violated prison rule 113.10 (7 NYCRR 270.2[b][14][I]) by possessing contraband classified as a weapon (id.; see Matter of Daughtry v Bezio, 84 AD3d 1623; Matter of McEwen v Goord, 32 AD3d 1116; Matter of Hammond v Selsky, 28 AD3d 1000; Matter of Shackleford v Goord, 3 AD3d 622; Matter of Nieves v Goord, 2 AD3d 1173; cf. Matter of Price v Phillips, 4 AD3d 364).

The petitioner's remaining contentions are without merit.
MASTRO, A.P.J., HALL, LOTT and SGROI, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino [*2]

Clerk of the Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.