People v Hamdam

Annotate this Case
People v Hamdam 2012 NY Slip Op 03463 Decided on May 1, 2012 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on May 1, 2012
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, A.P.J.
REINALDO E. RIVERA
RANDALL T. ENG
JOHN M. LEVENTHAL
ROBERT J. MILLER, JJ.
2009-05135
(Ind. No. 5233/04)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Jamil Hamdam, appellant.




Steven Banks, New York, N.Y. (Laura Lieberman Cohen of
counsel), for appellant.
Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard
Joblove and Victor Barall of
counsel), for respondent.


DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Garnett, J.), imposed May 22, 2009, on the ground that the resentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the resentence is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the resentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).
MASTRO, A.P.J., RIVERA, ENG, LEVENTHAL and MILLER, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.