People v Williams

Annotate this Case
People v Williams 2012 NY Slip Op 03821 Decided on May 15, 2012 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on May 15, 2012
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P.
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
SHERI S. ROMAN
ROBERT J. MILLER, JJ.
2009-04998

[*1]People of State of New York, respondent,

v

Edward Williams, appellant. Del Atwell, East Hampton, N.Y., for appellant.




William V. Grady, District Attorney, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. (Kirsten
A. Rappleyea of counsel), for respondent.


DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Dutchess County (Hayes, J.), dated April 14, 2009, which, after a hearing, inter alia, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

In establishing a defendant's appropriate risk level under the Sex Offender Registration Act (see Correction Law art 6-C), the People bear the burden of proving the facts supporting the determination by clear and convincing evidence (see Correction Law § 168-n[3]; People v Williams, 90 AD3d 880, 881; People v Crandall, 90 AD3d 628, 629). Here, the People satisfied their burden of adducing facts in support of the assessment of 20 points under risk factor 3 (number of victims) by clear and convincing evidence. The presentence report and the case summary prepared by the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders constituted "reliable hearsay" (Correction Law § 168-n[3]), and provided a sufficient basis for the assessment of those points (see People v Mingo, 12 NY3d 563, 573; People v Williams, 90 AD3d at 881).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.

Accordingly, the County Court correctly designated the defendant a level three sex offender.
RIVERA, J.P., CHAMBERS, ROMAN and MILLER, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.