People v Mendoza

Annotate this Case
People v Mendoza 2010 NY Slip Op 09291 [79 AD3d 910] December 14, 2010 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, February 16, 2011

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Glenn Mendoza, Appellant.

—[*1] Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Kendra L. Hutchinson of counsel), for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano, Jeanette Lifschitz, and Suzanne D. O'Hare of counsel), for respondent.

Appeals by the defendant from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hollie, J.), rendered September 18, 2002, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, grand larceny in the fourth degree, petit larceny, and criminal mischief in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence, and (2) a resentence of the same court imposed April 3, 2006.

Ordered that the judgment and the resentence are affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's identity as one of the perpetrators of the subject offenses beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon our independent review pursuant to CPL 470.15 (5), we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633 [2006]).

The defendant's remaining contention is without merit. Rivera, J.P., Dillon, Angiolillo and Austin, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.