People v Speight

Annotate this Case
People v Speight 2010 NY Slip Op 08763 [78 AD3d 1082] November 23, 2010 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, January 19, 2011

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Patrick Speight, Appellant.

—[*1] Steven Banks, New York, N.Y. (Harold V. Ferguson, Jr., of counsel), for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove, Linda Breen, and Adam Koelsch of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ingram, J.), rendered June 10, 2008, convicting him of grand larceny in the fourth degree and petit larceny, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Upon our independent review of the evidence pursuant to CPL 470.15 (5), we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633 [2006]).

The defendant's remaining contentions, concerning the handling of notes from the jury (see CPL 310.30) and an Allen charge (see Allen v United States, 164 US 492 [1896]), are not preserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Starling, 85 NY2d 509, 516 [1995]), and we decline to reach those issues in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction (see CPL 470.15 [3] [c]). Covello, J.P., Dickerson, Belen and Lott, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.