People v Powell

Annotate this Case
People v Powell 2010 NY Slip Op 08760 [78 AD3d 1080] November 23, 2010 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, January 19, 2011

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Nathan Powell, Appellant.

—[*1] Judah Maltz, Kew Gardens, N.Y., for appellant, and appellant pro se.

Kathleen M. Rice, District Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Tammy J. Smiley, Judith R. Sternberg, and Matthew C. Frankel of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a resentence of the County Court, Nassau County (Jaeger, J.), imposed November 19, 2008, upon his conviction of manslaughter in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, imposed August 18, 2003.

Ordered that the resentence is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant's assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]).

The defendant has not, nor could he have, raised any nonfrivolous issues in his supplemental pro se brief. Dillon, J.P., Santucci, Dickerson and Chambers, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.