People v Saxton
Annotate this Case
People v Saxton
2010 NY Slip Op 07793 [77 AD3d 976]
October 26, 2010
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau
pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, December 15, 2010
The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Maurice Saxton, Appellant.
The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Maurice Saxton, Appellant.
—[*1] Steven Banks, New York, N.Y. (Justin Diamant of counsel), for appellant.
Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Camille O'Hara Gillespie of counsel; Gaia Goffe on the brief), for respondent.
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (D'Emic, J.), imposed January 16, 2009, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
Ordered that the sentence is affirmed. No opinion. Prudenti, P.J., Rivera, Angiolillo, Eng and Roman, JJ., concur.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
