Blue Ridge Ins. Co. v Empire Contr. & Sales, Inc.

Annotate this Case
Blue Ridge Ins. Co. v Empire Contr. & Sales, Inc. 2010 NY Slip Op 04326 [73 AD3d 959] May 18, 2010 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, June 30, 2010

Blue Ridge Insurance Company, Appellant,
v
Empire Contracting and Sales, Inc., et al., Defendants, and Mitchell Juneau, Respondent.

—[*1] Kelly, Luglio & Arcuri, LLP, Deer Park, N.Y. (Andrew A. Arcuri of counsel), for appellant.

Daniel W. Coffey, Albany, N.Y. (Mark W. Blanchfield of counsel), for respondent.

In an action for a judgment declaring that the plaintiff is not obligated to defend or indemnify the defendant Empire Contracting and Sales, Inc., in an underlying personal injury action entitled Patenaude v Empire Contr. & Sales, Inc., pending in the Supreme Court, Clinton County, under index No. 01-0349, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cohalan, J.), dated May 21, 2009, which granted the motion of the defendant Mitchell Juneau for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion of the defendant Mitchell Juneau for summary judgment is denied.

Under the facts of this case, the Supreme Court erred in granting the motion of the defendant Mitchell Juneau for summary judgment. In support of his motion, Juneau failed to make a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see generally Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851, 853 [1985]).

Pursuant to Insurance Law § 3420 (d) (2), an insurer "shall give written notice as soon as is reasonably possible of [its] disclaimer of liability or denial of coverage to the insured and the injured person or any other claimant." Here, the plaintiff's commencement of the subject declaratory judgment action on August 15, 2001, constituted timely notice of disclaimer as to Juneau (see Generali-U.S. Branch v Rothschild, 295 AD2d 236, 237-238 [2002]; see also Continental Cas. Co. v Employers Ins. Co. of Wausau, 60 AD3d 128, 135 [2008]).

The parties' remaining contentions either are without merit or need not be reached in light of our determination. Rivera, J.P., Fisher, Florio and Austin, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.