Shanon v Patterson

Annotate this Case
Shanon v Patterson 2010 NY Slip Op 00949 [70 AD3d 809] February 9, 2010 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, March 31, 2010

Milette Shanon, Respondent,
v
Jerome D. Patterson, Appellant.

—[*1] Jerome D. Patterson, Bayside, N.Y., appellant pro se.

Milette Shanon, Forest Hills, N.Y., respondent pro se.

In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment entered May 5, 2003, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Fitzmaurice, J.), dated November 17, 2008, as denied that branch of his cross motion which was for the release of certain funds being held for the purpose of securing his child support obligation.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court has the discretion to direct an undertaking to insure payment of child support obligations (see Krinsky v Krinsky, 208 AD2d 601 [1994]; Labow v Labow, 154 AD2d 90 [1990]; Rainone v Rainone, 118 AD2d 766, 767 [1986]). In light of the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the defendant's cross motion which was for the release of certain funds being held for the purpose of securing his child support obligation.

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit. Rivera, J.P., Leventhal, Hall and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.