People v Williams

Annotate this Case
People v Williams 2010 NY Slip Op 00889 [70 AD3d 733] February 2, 2010 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, March 31, 2010

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Anton Williams, Appellant.

—[*1] James D. Licata, New City, N.Y. (Lois Cappelletti of counsel), for appellant.

Thomas P. Zugibe, District Attorney, New City, N.Y. (Itamar J. Yeger of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County (Kelly, J.), rendered November 14, 2007, convicting him of robbery in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Since the defendant pleaded guilty with the express understanding that if he failed to successfully complete a Drug Treatment Alternative-to-Prison Program, the County Court would impose the enhanced sentence of which he now complains, he has "no basis now to complain that his sentence was excessive" (People v Melendez-Smith, 66 AD3d 1042, 1043 [2009]; see People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816, 817 [1984]; People v Billups, 63 AD3d 750 [2009]). In any event, under the circumstances, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Rivera, J.P., Covello, Angiolillo, Leventhal and Roman, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.