Matter of Fasano v Battista

Annotate this Case
Matter of Fasano v Battista 2009 NY Slip Op 09223 [68 AD3d 863] December 8, 2009 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, February 10, 2010

In the Matter of Stephanie Fasano, Appellant,
v
Michaelangelo Battista, Respondent.

—[*1] Law Office of Steven A. Morelli, P.C., Carle Place, N.Y., for appellant.

Posner & Gaier, Hempstead, N.Y. (Stephen Posner and Phyllis L. Gaier of counsel), for respondent.

Isa D. Kantor, Hicksville, N.Y., attorney for the child.

In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Singer, J.), dated October 24, 2008, as, without a hearing, granted that branch of the father's motion which was to dismiss her petition to modify a prior order of the same court (Kase, J.), dated June 27, 2006, inter alia, awarding sole custody of the subject child to the father, so as to award her sole custody of the subject child.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the mother's contention, the Family Court properly dismissed, without a hearing, her petition to modify a prior order so as to award her sole custody. Where possible, custody should be established on a long term basis, "at least so long as the custodial parent has not been shown to be unfit, or perhaps less fit, to continue as the proper custodian" (Obey v Degling, 37 NY2d 768, 770 [1975]; see Matter of Lopez v Infante, 55 AD3d 837 [2008]; DiVittorio v DiVittorio, 36 AD3d 848, 849 [2007]; Jackson v Jackson, 31 AD3d 386 [2006]). A noncustodial parent seeking a change of custody is not entitled to a hearing without making some evidentiary showing sufficient to warrant a hearing (see Matter of Lopez v Infante, 55 AD3d at 838; Matter of Bauman v Abbate, 48 AD3d 679, 680 [2008]; DiVittorio v DiVittorio, 36 AD3d at 849). Here, the mother failed to make such a showing.

We decline the father's request to impose sanctions against the mother. Mastro, J.P., Florio, Balkin and Leventhal, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.