Rodriguez v Martinelli
Annotate this CaseWilfredo Rodriguez, Respondent,
v
Rose Martinelli, Appellant.
—[*1] Robert P. Tusa (Sweetbaum & Sweetbaum, Lake Success, N.Y. [Marshall D. Sweetbaum], of counsel), for appellant.
PeÑa & Kahn, PLLC, Bronx, N.Y. (Justin B. Katz of counsel), for respondent.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (F. Rivera, J.), dated June 27, 2008, as denied that branch of her motion which was for summary judgment on the issues of liability and apportionment.
Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as the order dated June 27, 2008, was superseded by an order of the same court dated February 13, 2008 (see Rodriguez v Martinelli, 68 AD3d 843 [2009] [decided herewith]). Rivera, J.P., Dickerson, Hall and Lott, JJ., concur.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.