Lee v Fromcheck

Annotate this Case
Lee v Fromcheck 2009 NY Slip Op 08587 [67 AD3d 867] November 17, 2009 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, January 6, 2010

Richard Lee, Respondent,
v
Robin Fromcheck, Appellant.

—[*1] Mangi & Graham, LLP, Westbury, N.Y. (James J. Graham, Jr., of counsel), for appellant.

The Barbara Law Firm, Garden City, N.Y. (Cindy A. Prusinowksi of counsel), for respondent.

In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment entered November 5, 1999, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Zimmerman, J.), dated July 22, 2008, as denied, without a hearing, that branch of her motion which was, in effect, for a modification of the plaintiff's child support obligation.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied, without a hearing, that branch of the defendant's motion which was, in effect, for a modification of the plaintiff's child support obligation. The defendant did not allege, much less prove, that the plaintiff was failing to pay adequate child support, did not dispute the plaintiff's contention that he was paying all of the child's college and other expenses, and failed to allege or demonstrate that the needs of the child were not being met (cf. Friedman v Friedman, 65 AD3d 1081 [2009]). Rivera, J.P., Florio, Miller and Hall, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.