Klee v Americas Best Bottling Co., Inc.

Annotate this Case
Klee v Americas Best Bottling Co., Inc. 2009 NY Slip Op 02330 [60 AD3d 911] March 24, 2009 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, May 6, 2009

Lewis Klee, Respondent,
v
Americas Best Bottling Co., Inc., et al., Appellants.

—[*1] Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker LLP, New York, N.Y. (Richard E. Lerner, Gregory S. Katz, and Trevor J. Barr of counsel), for appellants.

Thomas D. Wilson, P.C., Brooklyn, N.Y., for respondent.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schmidt, J.), dated March 27, 2008, which granted the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The plaintiff pedestrian was crossing the street in a crosswalk with the traffic signal in his favor when, as he was about three quarters of the way across the street, he was struck on his left side by the defendants' vehicle as it was making a left turn. The evidence submitted by the plaintiff established, as a matter of law, that the defendant driver violated Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1112 (a) and that the plaintiff was free from comparative negligence (cf. Cator v Filipe, 47 AD3d 664 [2008]). In opposition, the defendants failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Accordingly, the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability was properly granted. Skelos, J.P., Santucci, Angiolillo, Dickerson and Chambers, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.