Sotomayor v Yarmouth Lbr.
Annotate this CaseJoe Sotomayor, Appellant,
v
Yarmouth Lumber et al., Respondents.
—[*1] Law Office of Donald Friedman, P.C., Brooklyn, N.Y. (Mitchell Gorkin of counsel), for appellant.
Kopff, Nardelli & Dopf LLP, New York, N.Y. (Martin B. Adams of counsel), for respondents.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vaughan, J.), dated May 14, 2008, which granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The defendants established, prima facie, their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Accordingly, the Supreme Court correctly granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Fisher, J.P., Angiolillo, Balkin and Belen, JJ., concur.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.