People v Beverly

People v Beverly 2006 NY Slip Op 09638 [35 AD3d 754] December 19, 2006 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, February 14, 2007

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Samuel Beverly, Appellant.

—[*1]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Eng, J.), rendered August 5, 2004, convicting him of burglary in the first degree, burglary in the second degree, menacing in the second degree (two counts), criminal mischief in the fourth degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by vacating the conviction of burglary in the second degree, vacating the sentence imposed thereon, and dismissing that count of the indictment; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the trial court providently exercised its discretion in making its Sandoval ruling (see People v Sandoval, 34 NY2d 371, 374 [1974]), as it struck a proper balance between the probative worth of the evidence of the defendant's criminal history and the possible prejudice to him (see People v Barmore, 11 AD3d 629 [2004]; People v Powell, 4 AD3d 489 [2004]).

As the People correctly concede, the defendant's conviction of burglary in the second degree and the sentence imposed thereon must be vacated and that count of the indictment must be dismissed, as it is a lesser included offense of burglary in the first degree (see People v Vega, 262 AD2d 589 [1999]). [*2]

The defendant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, raised in his supplemental pro se brief, is without merit, and his remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review. Schmidt, J.P., Santucci, Krausman and Rivera, JJ., concur.