People v Pipkin

Annotate this Case
People v Pipkin 2006 NY Slip Op 09584 [35 AD3d 693] December 19, 2006 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, February 14, 2007

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
John Pipkin, Appellant.

—[*1]Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rienzi, J.), dated January 7, 2005, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the failure of his counsel at the hearing to controvert the assessment of 40 points under risk factors 9 and 10 did not, under the circumstances of this case, constitute ineffective assistance of counsel. Florio, J.P., Mastro, Spolzino and Skelos, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.