People v Davis

Annotate this Case
People v Davis 2006 NY Slip Op 09580 [35 AD3d 690] December 19, 2006 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, February 14, 2007

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Charles Davis, Appellant.

—[*1]Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marrero, J.), dated February 10, 2005, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The hearing court correctly found that the People had met their burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence the facts that supported the defendant's adjudication as a level three sex offender (see Correction Law § 168-n [3]; People v Graeber, 31 AD3d 517 [2006]; People v Perser, 29 AD3d 767 [2006]; People v Davis, 26 AD3d 364, 364-365 [2006]; cf. People v Thompson, 31 AD3d 409 [2006]).

The defendant's remaining claim is without merit. Goldstein, J.P., Skelos, Lunn and Covello, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.