Matter of Williams v Oppenheimer & Co. Inc.

Annotate this Case
Matter of Williams v Oppenheimer & Co., Inc. 2006 NY Slip Op 09262 [35 AD3d 491] December 5, 2006 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, February 14, 2007

In the Matter of Joseph Williams et al., Appellants,
v
Oppenheimer & Company, Inc., Respondent.

—[*1]In a proceeding to quash a subpoena duces tecum served by the respondent upon an out-of-state nonparty witness in an arbitration proceeding before the National Association of Securities Dealers and for the imposition of a sanction upon the respondent, the petitioners appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Dunne, J.), dated November 21, 2005, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order as denied that branch of the petition which was to quash the subpoena is dismissed as academic, as the arbitration proceeding has been concluded; and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as reviewed; and is it further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the respondent.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in not imposing a sanction against the respondent under 22 NYCRR130-1.1 (c). Prudenti, P.J., Schmidt, Dillon and Covello, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.