People v Lewis

Annotate this Case
People v Lewis 2006 NY Slip Op 08265 [34 AD3d 599] November 14, 2006 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, January 17, 2007

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Timothy Lewis, Appellant.

—[*1]Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Buchter, J.), rendered October 16, 2002, convicting him of rape in the first degree, rape in the second degree, sexual abuse in the first degree, and endangering the welfare of a child, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's allegations of improper bolstering are unpreserved for appellate review as the defense counsel either failed to make specific and timely objections to the testimony at trial (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Wilson, 295 AD2d 545 [2002]) or failed to seek further ameliorative action after certain objections were sustained (see People v Medina, 53 NY2d 951 [1981]; People v Powell, 4 AD3d 489 [2004]; People v Joseph, 298 AD2d 601 [2002]). In any event, any error was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant's guilt (see People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230 [1975]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

The defendant's remaining contention is without merit. Schmidt, J.P., Santucci, Mastro and Fisher, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.