People v Rennie

Annotate this Case
People v Rennie 2006 NY Slip Op 08156 [34 AD3d 504] November 8, 2006 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, January 17, 2007

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Dareil Rennie, Appellant.

—[*1]Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Tomei, J.), rendered October 31, 2002, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The court did not err in granting the prosecutor's challenge for cause to a prospective juror (see People v Shulman, 6 NY3d 1, 27-28 [2005]; People v Nicholas, 98 NY2d 749, 751-752 [2002]; People v Chambers, 97 NY2d 417, 419 [2002]; People v Anderson, 242 AD2d 489 [1997]).

The contentions raised by the defendant in his supplemental pro se brief are without merit. Miller, J.P., Ritter, Rivera and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.