People v Murphy

Annotate this Case
People v Murphy 2006 NY Slip Op 07461 [33 AD3d 778] October 17, 2006 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, December 13, 2006

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Harry Murphy, Appellant.

—[*1]

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Rockland County (Resnik, J.), entered January 24, 2005, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The defendant's history of drug and alcohol abuse and other factors that were not contested by him, which resulted in 110 points on the risk assessment form, was a sufficient basis to designate him a level three sex offender (see People v Abdullah, 31 AD3d 515 [2006]).

His contention that he was improperly assessed additional points based upon uncertified copies of certain depositions need not be addressed since there was a sufficient basis to designate him a level three sex offender without those depositions (see People v Lombard, 30 AD3d 573 [2006]). Adams, J.P., Goldstein, Mastro and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.