People v Morris

Annotate this Case
People v Morris 2006 NY Slip Op 07460 [33 AD3d 778] October 17, 2006 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, December 13, 2006

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Darryl Morris, Appellant.

—[*1]Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Guzman, J.), dated February 24, 2005, which designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court's determination designating the defendant a level three sex offender is supported by clear and convincing evidence (see Correction Law § 168-n [3]) and, therefore, should not be disturbed on appeal (see People v O'Neal, 26 AD3d 365 [2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 702 [2006]; People v Baylor, 19 AD3d 467 [2005]; People v Smith, 5 AD3d 752 [2004]; People v Stokes, 5 AD3d 651 [2004]; People v Cureton, 299 AD2d 532 [2002]).

The defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Barber, 29 AD3d 660 [2006]; People v Burgess, 6 AD3d 686 [2004]; People v Angelo, 3 AD3d 482 [2004]; People v Cureton, supra), or are based on matter dehors the record (see People v Gliatta, 27 AD3d 441 [2006]). Adams, J.P., Krausman, Fisher and Dillon, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.