People v Rogers

Annotate this Case
People v Rogers 2006 NY Slip Op 07386 [33 AD3d 732] October 10, 2006 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, December 13, 2006

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Andre Rogers, Appellant.

—[*1]Application by the appellant pro se for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated June 6, 2005 (People v Rogers, 19 AD3d 437 [2005]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered February 6, 2003.

Ordered that the appellant is granted leave to serve and file a brief on the issues of whether trial counsel became a witness against the defendant when he submitted his pro se motion pursuant to CPL 330.30, and whether the trial court should have assigned him a new attorney in connection with CPL 330.30 motion; and it is further,

Ordered that pursuant to County Law § 722, the following named attorney is assigned as counsel: Joseph Faraguna, Esq. P.O. Box 122 Sag Harbor, N.Y. 11963, and it is further,

Ordered that assigned counsel shall serve and file a brief expeditiously in accordance with this court's rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1 et seq.) and written directions; and it is further, [*2]

Ordered that the application is held in abeyance in the interim. Krausman, J.P., Fisher, Lifson and Covello, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.