People v Claudio Nunez

Annotate this Case
People v Nunez 2006 NY Slip Op 05821 [31 AD3d 669] July 18, 2006 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, September 20, 2006

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Claudio Nunez, Appellant.

—[*1]Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Dolan, J.), rendered September 15, 2004, convicting him of aggravated harassment of an employee by an inmate, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant's contention raised in point two of his brief is without merit and his remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]). Schmidt, J.P., Adams, Luciano and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.