Matter of Charles J. Pohanka v Working Families Party of New York State

Matter of Pohanka v Working Families Party of N. Y. State 2006 NY Slip Op 05117 [30 AD3d 625] Decided on June 22, 2006 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on June 22, 2006
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P.
GLORIA GOLDSTEIN
WILLIAM F. MASTRO
STEVEN W. FISHER, JJ.
2006-05829 DECISION & ORDER

[*1]In the Matter of Charles J. Pohanka III, et al., petitioners-respondents,

v

Working Families Party of New York State, et al., appellants, et al., respondent-respondent. (Index No. 2925/06)




Henry T. Berger, New York, N.Y., for appellants.
Vincent J. Messina, Jr., Central Islip, N.Y., for petitioners-
respondents.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to prohibit the enforcement of a rule of the Working Families Party of New York State, adopted February 4, 2006, vesting the State Committee of the Working Families Party of New York State with the power to issue certificates authorizing the nomination of candidates who are not enrolled members of the Working Families Party of New York State, inter alia, for county, town, and village elections, even in counties where there is a duly-constituted County Committee of the Working Families Party of New York State, the appeal is from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Spinner, J.), dated June 8, 2006, which granted the petition and declared the subject rule to be null, void, and of no force and effect.

ORDERED that the order and judgment is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed.

Contrary to the petitioners' contention, the State Committee of the Working Families Party of New York State is empowered to amend its rules to permit it to issue certificates authorizing the nomination of candidates, inter alia, for county, town, and village elections, even though the candidate is not enrolled as a member of the Working Families Party of New York State (see Election Law § 6-120[3]; Schiliro v Mazza, 53 NY2d 735, 736; Independence Party State Committee [*2]of State of New York v Berman, 28 AD3d 556; Matter of Donnelly v Curcio, 284 AD2d 460; see also Auerbach v Board of Educ., 86 NY2d 198). The petitioners' reliance upon Martin v Alverez (21 AD3d 572), is misplaced, inasmuch as the Working Families Party of New York State has amended the rule in question.
FLORIO, J.P., GOLDSTEIN, MASTRO and FISHER, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court