People v Oscar Rios

Annotate this Case
People v Rios 2006 NY Slip Op 05043 [30 AD3d 623] Decided on June 20, 2006 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on June 20, 2006
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
HOWARD MILLER, J.P.
WILLIAM F. MASTRO
STEVEN W. FISHER
ROBERT J. LUNN, JJ.
2003-04949 DECISION & ORDER

[*1]The People, etc., respondent,

v

Oscar Rios, appellant. (Ind. No. 385/02)




Oscar Rios, Dannemora, N.Y., appellant pro se.
Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y.
(John M. Castellano, Nicoletta J.
Caferri, and Merri Turk Lasky of
counsel), for respondent.
Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (M. Chris Fabricant of
counsel), former appellate counsel.

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this court dated February 28, 2006 (People v Rios, 26 AD3d 521), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered May 22, 2003.

ORDERED that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277).
MILLER, J.P., MASTRO, FISHER and LUNN, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.