People v Detroy Livingston

Annotate this Case
People v Livingston 2006 NY Slip Op 05036 [30 AD3d 615] Decided on June 20, 2006 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on June 20, 2006
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, J.P.
THOMAS A. ADAMS
STEPHEN G. CRANE
DAVID S. RITTER, JJ.
1998-04172 DECISION & ORDER

[*1]The People, etc., respondent,

v

Detroy Livingston, appellant. (Ind. No. 3521/86)




Detroy Livingston, Elmira, N.Y., appellant pro se.
Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard
Joblove and Karol B. Mangum of
counsel), for respondent.

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this court dated March 11, 1991 (People v Livingston, 171 AD2d 759), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered December 2, 1987.

ORDERED that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277).
SCHMIDT, J.P., ADAMS, CRANE and RITTER, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.