People v David Thigpen

Annotate this Case
People v Thigpen 2006 NY Slip Op 04872 [30 AD3d 548] Decided on June 13, 2006 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on June 13, 2006
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
ANITA R. FLORIO
HOWARD MILLER
FRED T. SANTUCCI, JJ.
1994-04190 DECISION & ORDER

[*1]The People, etc., respondent,

v

David Thigpen, appellant. (Ind. No. 574/93)




David Thigpen, Albion, N.Y., appellant pro se.
Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard
Joblove and Thomas M. Ross of
counsel), for respondent.

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this court dated December 16, 1996 (People v Thigpen, 234 AD2d 486), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered April 25, 1994.

ORDERED that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277).
PRUDENTI, P.J., FLORIO, MILLER and SANTUCCI, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.