Roger A. Mason v Leslaw J. Gredysa

Annotate this Case
Mason v Gredysa 2006 NY Slip Op 04808 [30 AD3d 480] Decided on June 13, 2006 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on June 13, 2006
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
HOWARD MILLER, J.P.
DAVID S. RITTER
GLORIA GOLDSTEIN
ROBERT J. LUNN, JJ.
2004-08989 DECISION & ORDER
2005-02984

[*1]Roger A. Mason, etc., appellant,

v

Leslaw J. Gredysa, etc., respondent. (Index No. 23578/94)




Kieffer and Hahn, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Michael C. Devine of
counsel), for appellant.
Garfunkel, Wild & Travis, P.C., Great Neck, N.Y. (Michael J.
Keane of counsel), for respondent.

In an action to recover damages for breach of an employment agreement in which the defendant asserted counterclaims to recover damages for breach of the employment agreement, the plaintiff appeals from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Berler, J.), entered August 23, 2004, and (2) a resettled judgment of the same court entered February 24, 2005, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the defendant and against him in the sum of $251,102.27.

ORDERED that the appeal from the judgment entered August 23, 2004, is dismissed, as that judgment has been superseded by the resettled judgment entered February 24, 2005; and it is further,

ORDERED that the resettled judgment entered February 24, 2005, is reversed, on the law, the judgment is vacated, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for a new trial, with costs to abide the event.

In light of, inter alia, the erroneous, confusing, and incomplete jury charge concerning the parties' conflicting claims as to who breached their employment contract, which resulted in prejudice to the plaintiff, a new trial is required (see Maloney Carpentry v Budnick, 19 AD3d 378; Penny W. Budoff P.C. v Jenkins, 143 AD2d 250).
MILLER, J.P., RITTER, GOLDSTEIN and LUNN, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.