Matter of Franklyn Richards v Carla Campbell

Annotate this Case
Matter of Richards v Campbell 2006 NY Slip Op 04429 [19 AD3d 1184] Decided on June 6, 2006 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on June 6, 2006
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P.
THOMAS A. ADAMS
DANIEL F. LUCIANO
STEVEN W. FISHER, JJ.
2004-10614 DECISION & ORDER

[*1]In the Matter of Franklyn Richards, respondent,

v

Carla Campbell, appellant. (Docket No. V-3953/01)




Salvatore C. Adamo, New York, N.Y., for appellant.
Cynthia A. Lee, Staten Island, N.Y., for respondent.
Carol Sherman, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Barbara H. Dildine and Janet
Neustaetter of counsel), Law
Guardian for the child.

In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Goldstein, R.), dated October 15, 2004, as, after a hearing, awarded the father custody of the parties' child.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Upon our review of the forensic evaluations and hearing testimony and considering the recommendation of the Law Guardian, we conclude that the Family Court correctly determined
that the best interests of the child would be served by awarding the father custody (see Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 NY2d 167).
FLORIO, J.P., ADAMS, LUCIANO and FISHER, JJ., concur. [*2]

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.