People v Diego Baldares-Lima

Annotate this Case
People v Baldares-Lima 2006 NY Slip Op 03911 [29 AD3d 813] May 16, 2006 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, July 19, 2006

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Diego Baldares-Lima, Appellant.

—[*1]Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), rendered September 29, 2004, convicting him of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree, upon his guilty plea, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to advise him that deportation was a possible consequence of his conviction is without merit (see People v McDonald, 1 NY3d 109, 114 [2003]; People v Ford, 86 NY2d 397, 404 [1995]; People v Sandher, 12 AD3d 464, 465 [2004]). Schmidt, J.P., Crane, Krausman, Skelos and Lunn, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.