Matter of Raquel Rosenthal v Augustus Agate
Annotate this CaseIn the Matter of Raquel Rosenthal, Petitioner,
v
Augustus Agate, as Justice of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Respondent. Lorraine F. Orlando et al., Nonparty Respondents.
—[*1]
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus, inter alia, to compel the respondent, Augustus Agate, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Queens County, among other things, to sign an order to show cause to hold the nonparty respondents in contempt of court for failure to comply with a subpoena directing them to appear for postjudgment depositions in an action entitled Rosenthal v Orlando, pending in the Supreme Court, Queens County, under index No. 15126/96.
Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
Mandamus does not lie to compel a Justice of the Supreme Court to sign an order to show cause (see Matter of Greenhaus v Milano, 242 AD2d 383 [1997]). Schmidt, J.P., Luciano, Spolzino and Fisher, JJ., concur.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.