Lorraine Lewkowitz v County of Suffolk

Annotate this Case
Lewkowitz v County of Suffolk 2006 NY Slip Op 03853 [29 AD3d 746] May 16, 2006 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, July 19, 2006

Lorraine Lewkowitz, Respondent,
v
County of Suffolk et al., Appellants.

—[*1]In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for false arrest, civil rights violations, and negligent hiring and retention, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Jones, Jr., J.), dated March 4, 2005, as denied that branch of their motion which was for a protective order with respect to items 1, 3, and 4 of the plaintiff's interrogatories and granted that branch of the plaintiff's cross motion which was to compel compliance with those interrogatories.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for a new determination of that branch of the motion which was for a protective order with respect to items 1, 3, and 4 of the plaintiff's interrogatories, and that branch of the cross motion which was to compel compliance with those interrogatories following an in camera inspection of the information sought in items 1, 3, and 4 of the interrogatories.

Under the circumstances, the Supreme Court should have conducted an in camera inspection of the information sought in items 1, 3, and 4 of the plaintiff's interrogatories (see Civil Rights Law § 50-a; Estate of McConlogue v County of Nassau, 208 AD2d 888, 889 [1994]; Becker v City [*2]of New York, 162 AD2d 488, 489 [1990]; Lawrence v City of New York, 118 AD2d 758, 759 [1986]). Accordingly, we remit the matter to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County. Schmidt, J.P., Crane, Krausman, Skelos and Lunn, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.