Edward Trudel v Eric D. Donnenfeld

Trudel v Donnenfeld 2006 NY Slip Op 03574 [29 AD3d 569] May 2, 2006 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, July 19, 2006

Edward Trudel, Appellant,
v
Eric D. Donnenfeld et al., Respondents.

—[*1]In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCarty, J.), entered October 18, 2004, which, upon a jury verdict in favor of the defendants and against him, dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, the jury verdict was based on a fair interpretation of the evidence (see Lolik v Big V Supermarkets, 86 NY2d 744, 746 [1995]; Sullivan v Katz, 7 AD3d 513 [2004]; McKnight v LaGuardia Hosp., 263 AD2d 500, 501 [1999]). We reject the plaintiff's contention that trial errors and misconduct by the defendants' attorney require reversal and a new trial. Crane, J.P., Ritter, Mastro and Lunn, JJ., concur.