Margaret Cruz v James P. McAneney

Annotate this Case
Cruz v McAneney 2006 NY Slip Op 03530 [29 AD3d 512] May 2, 2006 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, July 19, 2006

Margaret Cruz, Respondent,
v
James P. McAneney, Appellant.

—[*1]In an action to recover a monetary award distributed by the Federal September 11th Victim Compensation Fund of 2001, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lewis, J.), entered October 17, 2003, which granted the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction enjoining him from, inter alia, transferring any portion of the award and directed him to maintain the award in a neutral, third-party escrow account.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

To establish entitlement to a preliminary injunction, a plaintiff must show a probability of success on the merits, a danger of irreparable injury in the absence of an injunction, and a balance of the equities in its favor (see Aetna Ins. Co. v Capasso, 75 NY2d 860, 862 [1990]; Regatta Condominium Assn. v Village of Mamaroneck, 303 AD2d 741, 742 [2003]; Klein, Wagner & Morris v Lawrence A. Klein, P.C., 186 AD2d 631 [1992]). Here, the Supreme Court properly granted the motion for a preliminary injunction (see Cruz v McAneney, 31 AD3d 54 [2006). Florio, J.P., Krausman, Luciano and Spolzino, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.