People v Anthony Silas

Annotate this Case
People v Silas 2006 NY Slip Op 03118 [28 AD3d 795] April 25, 2006 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, June 21, 2006

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Anthony Silas, Appellant.

—[*1]Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (LaPera, J.), rendered October 3, 2003, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree and criminal possession of marijuana in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

That branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence was properly denied (see People v Brown, 96 NY2d 80 [2001]; People v Mitchell, 39 NY2d 173 [1976], cert denied 426 US 953 [1976]).

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit. Adams, J.P., Ritter, Mastro and Skelos, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.