Matter of Camille May Voutour v Dianna S. Mazzarese

Matter of Voutour v Mazzarese 2006 NY Slip Op 02900 [28 AD3d 671] April 18, 2006 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, June 21, 2006

In the Matter of Camille May Voutour, Appellant,
v
Dianna S. Mazzarese et al., Respondents.

—[*1]In a child visitation proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the paternal grandmother appeals from so much of an order of the Family Court, Kings County (C. Goldstein, R.), dated January 26, 2005, as, after a hearing, awarded her only supervised monthly visitation with the subject child.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Under the facts of this case, the Family Court properly found that the child's visitation with the petitioner should be supervised (see Matter of Emanuel S. v Joseph E., 78 NY2d 178 [1991]; Matter of McNeill v Ressel, 265 AD2d 484 [1999]) Adams, J.P., Ritter, Rivera and Covello, JJ., concur.