Joseph N. Moray v DBAG, Inc.

Annotate this Case
Moray v DBAG, Inc. 2006 NY Slip Op 02730 [28 AD3d 527] April 11, 2006 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, June 21, 2006

Joseph N. Moray, Appellant,
v
DBAG, Inc., Respondent.

—[*1]In an action, inter alia, for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nastasi, J.), dated October 20, 2004, as granted that branch of the defendant's motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

In opposition to the defendant's prima facie demonstration of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law dismissing the complaint, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]). Thus, the Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the defendant's motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Miller, J.P., Ritter, Spolzino and Dillon, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.