Lora Fleysher v Joseph Fabian

Annotate this Case
Fleysher v Fabian 2006 NY Slip Op 02331 [27 AD3d 692] March 28, 2006 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, May 17, 2006

Lora Fleysher, Appellant,
v
Joseph Fabian, Respondent, et al., Defendant.

—[*1]In an action, inter alia, for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property, and to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Minardo, J.), dated September 28, 2005, as upon reargument, granted the defendant's motion to disqualify Howard M. File as counsel for the plaintiff.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion either by taking in camera testimony from the defendant (cf. Petrossian v Grossman, 219 AD2d 587, 588 [1995]), or upon reargument, in granting his motion to disqualify the plaintiff's counsel (see Mancheski v Gabelli Group Capital Partners, Inc., 22 AD3d 532 [2005]; cf. Jamaica Pub. Serv. Co. v AIU Ins. Co., 92 NY2d 631 [1998]). Krausman, J.P., Mastro, Fisher and Covello, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.