Happy Dragon Wholesale, Inc. v Gina Young

Annotate this Case
Happy Dragon Wholesale, Inc. v Young 2006 NY Slip Op 01768 [27 AD3d 524] March 14, 2006 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, May 17, 2006

Happy Dragon Wholesale, Inc., Appellant,
v
Gina Young et al., Respondents.

—[*1]In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that a lease entered into between the plaintiff and the prior owner of a parcel known as 31-69 College Point Boulevard was valid and in full force and effect, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Polizzi, J.), dated April 5, 2005, which denied its motion, inter alia, for a preliminary injunction.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, the Supreme Court did not err in denying that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was for a preliminary injunction since the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a likelihood of its success on the merits, irreparable injury absent the granting of the preliminary injunction, and that the balance of equities favored it (see CPLR 6301; First Franklin Sq. Assoc., LLC v Franklin Sq. Prop. Account, 15 AD3d 529, 532-533 [2005]; Gagnon Bus Co., Inc. v Vallo Transp., Ltd., 13 AD3d 334 [2004]).

The plaintiff's remaining contentions are without merit. Florio, J.P., Ritter, Goldstein and Covello, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.