People v Tishawn Robinson

Annotate this Case
People v Robinson 2006 NY Slip Op 01656 [27 AD3d 492] March 7, 2006 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, May 17, 2006

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Tishawn Robinson, Appellant.

—[*1]Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Collini, J.), rendered June 14, 2004, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the court erred in failing, in its charge, to elaborate on the meaning of "forcible stealing" is unpreserved for appellate review since he failed to request such a charge, object to the charge as delivered, or request supplemental instructions (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Burch, 188 AD2d 479, 480 [1992]; People v Roach, 188 AD2d 494 [1992]).

In any event, any error in the trial court's charge was harmless (see People v Gilmore, 66 NY2d 863, 867 [1985]; People v Jiggetts, 23 AD3d 582 [2005]; People v Burch, supra; People v Roach, supra). Crane, J.P., Goldstein, Luciano and Covello, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.