Paul Palmieri v Village of Babylon

Annotate this Case
Palmieri v Village of Babylon 2006 NY Slip Op 01289 [26 AD3d 423] February 21, 2006 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, April 19, 2006

Paul Palmieri, Appellant,
v
Village of Babylon, Respondent.

—[*1]

In an action, inter alia, to recover for damage to property, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Molia, J.), dated December 13, 2004, which denied his motion for leave to amend the complaint and to compel the defendant's response to his interrogatories.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff moved, inter alia, for leave to amend the complaint to increase the amount sought to be recovered for damage to property to the sum of $500,000 and to assert a claim for punitive damages in the sum of $500,000. Since the claims for damages set forth in the amended complaint were more than merely incidental to the equitable relief sought in the original complaint, the plaintiff was required to file a timely notice of claim pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (see CPLR 9801 [1]; Thoma v Town of Schodack, 6 AD3d 957 [2004]; Andrusz v Town of Lancaster, 289 AD2d 950 [2001]; Robertson v Town of Carmel, 276 AD2d 543 [2000]; American Pen Corp. v City of New York, 266 AD2d 87 [1999]). The plaintiff admittedly failed to file a notice of claim and, thus, that branch of his motion which was for leave to amend the complaint was properly denied (see Martz v Incorporated Vil. of Val. Stream, 210 AD2d 205 [1994]; Mathison v Zocco, 207 AD2d 434 [1994]; Hauptman v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., 162 AD2d 588, 589 [1990]).

The plaintiff's remaining contention is without merit. Schmidt, J.P., Mastro, Spolzino and Lunn, JJ., concur. [See 6 Misc 3d 1030(A), 2004 NY Slip Op 51843(U) (2004).]

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.