People v Larry T.

Annotate this Case
People v Larry T. 2006 NY Slip Op 01189 [26 AD3d 397] February 14, 2006 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, April 19, 2006

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Larry T., Appellant.

—[*1]Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Chin-Brandt, J.), imposed June 26, 2003, upon his plea of guilty, and after a hearing and determination that the defendant failed to comply with a cooperation agreement.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

On appeal, the defendant explicitly states that he does not wish to withdraw his plea of guilty. As part of the negotiated plea agreement, the defendant waived his right to appeal, and therefore has waived consideration of the issue of whether the sentence was excessive (see People v Lococo, 92 NY2d 825, 827 [1998]).

On appeal, the defendant acknowledges that he violated a cooperation agreement but claims he did not do so willfully and his efforts warrant some consideration. This contention relates to the alleged excessiveness of the sentence and therefore is not properly before this Court.

The defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Florio, J.P., Ritter, Skelos and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.