Matter of Philip Hanfling v Cheryl Hanfling

Annotate this Case
Matter of Hanfling v Hanfling 2006 NY Slip Op 01164 [26 AD3d 377] February 14, 2006 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, April 19, 2006

In the Matter of Philip Hanfling, Respondent,
v
Cheryl Hanfling, Appellant.

—[*1]In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment entered February 13, 2001, the former wife appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Balkin, J.), dated November 19, 2004, as denied that branch of her cross motion which was for an award of an attorney's fee.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying that branch of the appellant's cross motion which was for an award of an attorney's fee (see Sagarin v Sagarin, 264 AD2d 769 [1999]). Florio, J.P., Skelos, Fisher and Lunn, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.