Matter of Philip Hanfling v Cheryl Hanfling
Annotate this CaseIn the Matter of Philip Hanfling, Respondent,
v
Cheryl Hanfling, Appellant.
—[*1]In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment entered February 13, 2001, the former wife appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Balkin, J.), dated November 19, 2004, as denied that branch of her cross motion which was for an award of an attorney's fee.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying that branch of the appellant's cross motion which was for an award of an attorney's fee (see Sagarin v Sagarin, 264 AD2d 769 [1999]). Florio, J.P., Skelos, Fisher and Lunn, JJ., concur.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.