Katherine Tarone v Gregory J. Tarone

Annotate this Case
Tarone v Tarone 2006 NY Slip Op 00646 [25 AD3d 781] January 31, 2006 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, March 22, 2006

Katherine Tarone, Appellant,
v
Gregory J. Tarone, Defendant, and Madeleine Tarone, Respondent.

—[*1]In an action to recover on a mortgage note, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Pines, J.), dated September 20, 2004, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendant Madeleine Tarone which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against her.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Madeleine Tarone established her entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see CPLR 3212 [b]; Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]). Goldstein, J.P., Mastro, Spolzino and Lunn, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.