Matter of Kristin Nilsen v Robert Slowey

Annotate this Case
Matter of Nilsen v Slowey 2006 NY Slip Op 00360 [25 AD3d 614] January 17, 2006 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, March 22, 2006

In the Matter of Kristin Nilsen, Respondent,
v
Robert Slowey, Appellant.

—[*1]In a family offense proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, Robert Slowey appeals from an order of protection of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Lynaugh, J.), dated September 8, 2004, which, upon a finding made after a hearing that he had committed acts which would constitute the offense of harassment in the second degree, inter alia, directed him to stay away from petitioner's home and place of employment until September 8, 2006. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]) in which he moves to be relieved as assigned counsel.

Ordered that the order of protection is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the appellant's assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, supra; Lara v Vasquez, 103 AD2d 681 [1984]; cf. Matter of Kotzker v Bonafilia, 284 AD2d 535 [2001]). Florio, J.P., Krausman, Lifson and Lunn, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.