People v Carl Francois

Annotate this Case
People v Francois 2005 NY Slip Op 10148 [24 AD3d 797] December 27, 2005 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, February 15, 2006

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Carl Francois, Appellant.

—[*1]Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated March 28, 2005 (People v Francois, 16 AD3d 699 [2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 788 [2005]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered May 28, 2003.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745 [1983]; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Schmidt, J.P., Krausman, Rivera and Fisher, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.