Matter of Kim Ragland v Katherine Sullivan

Annotate this Case
Matter of Ragland v Sullivan 2005 NY Slip Op 10135 [24 AD3d 781] December 27, 2005 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, February 15, 2006

In the Matter of Kim Ragland, Petitioner,
v
Katherine Sullivan et al., Respondents.

—[*1]Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus, inter alia, to compel the respondents to accept certain motions for filing, and for poor person relief.

Ordered that the branch of the petition which is for poor person relief is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is otherwise denied and the proceeding is otherwise dismissed, as academic, without costs or disbursements.

This proceeding has been rendered academic as the motions in question have been accepted for filing by the Rockland County Clerk, and have been assigned to a justice for determination. Florio, J.P., Krausman, Skelos and Covello, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.