People v Angel Pagan

Annotate this Case
People v Pagan 2005 NY Slip Op 09336 [24 AD3d 1329] Decided on December 5, 2005 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on December 5, 2005
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
THOMAS A. ADAMS
GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN
ROBERT A. SPOLZINO
MARK C. DILLON, JJ. DECISION & ORDER
2004-06291

[*1]The People, etc., respondent,

v

Angel Pagan, appellant. (Ind. No. 6596/02)




Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Winston McIntosh of
counsel), for appellant.
Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard
Joblove and Sholom J. Twersky of
counsel; Melissa J. Erwin on the
brief), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (McKay, J.), imposed June 25, 2004, on the ground that the sentence is excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed. No opinion.
PRUDENTI, P.J., ADAMS, KRAUSMAN, SPOLZINO and DILLON, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.